‘Fairy Tale’ by Stephen King – Book Review

An Enjoyable But Formulaic Fantasy Lacking That Magic Spark

Fairy Tale could have been Stephen King’s best novel for quite some time. The idea of spinning a number of fairy tales into something dark and twisted is certainly not new (hello, Grimm!) but with King’s gift for writing compelling prose and twisted stories that stick with you, it’s a shame then to find Fairy Tale so… pedestrian.

In its simplest form, Fairy Tale is a story torn between two different states, with the first 30% or so playing out as a slice of life slow-burn before changing into more of a simplistic and formulaic fantasy tale. Given how many nods there are to different fables and stories of old, it’s hard to know whether this was intentional or not. Either way, the execution is very much going to be a love/hate affair for many readers.

The protagonist for this 600+ page story is Charlie Reade, a regular high school kid that uses anachronistic speech like “awesome sauce” and references old movies. The latter point can be waved away though by his reverence for TCM movies (take a shot every time TCM is mentioned!) but it’s still a little jarring and several times I found myself having to remember Charlie is only 17.

When Charlie’s mum is killed in a hit-and-run on “that goddamn bridge”, Charlie grows up with an alcoholic father whom he learns to take care of until he gets sober. This sets up a foundation of sorts for Charlie’s caring nature, as a promise he makes to God is tested in the form of his old neighbour Howard Bowditch.

As Charlie starts to look after him, he soon learns that there’s a portal across to a magical world, one ravaged by a disease called the Grey and a haunted city hiding much more sinister secrets – including a magical sundial that can turn back time.

To give much more away about the story would be slipping into spoiler territory but King certainly takes his sweet time to get to the good stuff. A slow burn can still be suspenseful and wracked with tension, as we’ve seen in the past with books like Pet Semetary. The difference with Fairy Tale though is in its execution. The prose changes drastically once Charlie reaches this other world and as the pace quickens, so too do the number of contrivances along the way.

There are several instances of deus ex machina late on that feel lazily implemented, while the story suffers from a very abrupt and rather unsatisfying ending. I half expected some big twist or grim lesson in humility but instead, the story just… ends.

To be fair, the book does dedicate its epilogue to trying to wrap everything up but by then it feels a little too late to be making amends for such a promising story that flat-lines into mediocrity.

In typical King fashion, Charlie Reade is a compelling protagonist with plenty of flaws and issues that are explored beautifully through the story. His bond with Radar the dog, his father and Howard Bowditch are easily the best parts of the story. Less compelling however, is the relationship he has with he various residents inside this magical world. There are an abundance of different players here and none feel all that compelling or fleshed out.

However, the world itself is absolutely brimming with details and there are several instances – not to mention the excellent opening third of the book – that are so beautifully written and immersive. Exploring this magical world, with Charlie riding his trike through certain areas, can be absolutely nail-biting and easily some of the best horror work King has put out for quite some time.

It’s a shame then that the wider plot falls short of brilliance. This is still a compelling read and full of beautiful descriptions and enjoyable set pieces, but next to so many other King books, this one is unlikely to be remembered for years to come. In the end, this is very much a formulaic fantasy tale – albeit an enjoyable one – lacking the magic needed to really shine brightly.

You can check out more of our book reviews here!

  • Verdict - 7/10

16 thoughts on “‘Fairy Tale’ by Stephen King – Book Review”

  1. I’m so glad to see there are others who felt like I did about this story. The first part had me drawn in and wondering what happens next. Once the story moved to Charlie and the “gladiator style” fighting I was struggling to keep myself interested. There was definitely something missing in the second half of the tale.

  2. *spoiler warning* Agreed. I had high hopes. And am a voracious SK reader. It felt like he added in too much, with no backstory or explanation, (where did Hana come from? Who fathered Molly? Who was Peterkin and were he are Chris the same?) and these characters were killed off way too easily, and the book was very anticlimactic. I was disappointed. It was like he created this entire story about Bowditch, the boy and the dog, the dad- so much beautiful backstory, then this random fairytale world, with random characters that made no sense, then he was in a hurry to end the story, so it ended, and i finished feeling like it should have been several books, better fleshed out, with a better ending, or, am I missing something? Not my favourite.

  3. Hey Mona, thanks for commenting! I’ve just gone in and corrected the bridge part as I realized it was “goddamn bridge” not damn bridge as I originally called it. The speech marks around it were simply how Charlie referred to it after the accident.

    I also changed the part about Howard because while he was his neighbour, next door was a bit too specific and could have been misinterpreted there!

    I’m really glad you enjoyed the book and thanks so much for taking the time to read this review!

    -Greg W

  4. It appears to me the reviewer may not have even read the book. It wasn’t called “that damn bridge” and Howard Bowditch wasn’t the next door neighbor. I thought the book was a great read, as most Stephen King novels are. The way he weaves his characters in and out is amazing to me. Perhaps the reviewer should look up the meaning of pedanticism.

  5. Yes, I was disappointed too. I’ve read most of King’s work and this one seemed to have elements of many of those, but not as good. Just felt like he was trying too hard

  6. While some parts did drag , i loved the story and characters. Good solid story about a boy and his dog ♡♡

  7. I thought it was underwhelming reboot of Talisman. It was also repetitive, and the characters were underdeveloped.
    Overall, SK is still my favorite storyteller, and his novels are like that proverbial “box of chocolates”. His next one will be better.

  8. I do not agree with this person’s opinion. I enjoyed the book. I thought the Jack and the Beanstalk twist mixed with The Talisman was a neat combination especially with all of the references to the different fairy tales of old, and new, and old TCM movies. I even cried throughout the book because Stephen King drew me in so I felt apart of the story.

  9. Totally agree with this review. I was so excited for a new King book I actually bought it rather than wait for library availability. Loved the first third, actually had tears in my eyes because of the beauty and power of that part of the story. The “fairy tale” part is awful, boring and seems like it was written by a different person.

  10. This is a very accurate and honest review. I am an avid Stephen King fan, and have read nearly everything he’s published, but I was left disappointed with Fairy Tale. It promised a lot, but did lack the usual spark that you associate with this accomplished author.

Leave a comment